Showing posts with label Analects. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Analects. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 25, 2020

Translation - Analects 2.16 Attacking strange sprouts

子曰:「攻乎異端,斯害也已!」

Zǐ yuē:`Gōng hū yì duān, sī hài yě yǐ!'

The master said, "Attacking strange sprouts? Truly exhausting and dangerous!"


Key Terms

gōng = attack, take the offensive; criticize or charge; study or specialize

yì = different, strange, unusual, surprising

duān = sprout, beginning

sī = cut, cleave; exhausting

hài = injure, kill, damage; obstruct

yǐ = modal particle (indeed, truly).


攻乎異端

"Attacking strange sprouts" could also be translated as "criticizing many different positions."


The idea seems to be "Spending all your time criticizing a variety of unusual positions? This is truly exhausting and dangerous to one's self!" The Confucian sage succeeds by identifying the needs of the moment and providing examplary leadership. The Confucian sage leads by example, providing successful and inspiring examples that address the challenges facing human society. How can the sage lead by example if the sage is consumed with rooting out and attacking the multitude of opinions and positions? This kind of "leadership" fails to lead.


Imagine the consequences of spending all one's effort and energy attacking every controversial statement on Twitter. Truly exhausting and dangerous!


Saturday, August 15, 2020

Translation - Analects 2.10 - 2.15 The Sage and Learning

子曰:「溫故而知新,可以為師矣。」

Zǐ yuē:`Wēn gù'ér zhī xīn, kěyǐ wéi shī yǐ.'

The master said: Reviewing the old and then understanding the new. In this way (you) become a teacher.


子曰:「君子不器。」

Zǐ yuē:`Jūnzǐ bù qì.'

The master said: the sage is not an instrument (receptacle).


子貢問君子。子曰:「先行其言,而後從之。」

Zi gòng wèn jūnzǐ. Zǐ yuē:`Xiānxíng qí yán, érhòu cóng zhī.'

Zi Gong asked about the sage (junzi). The master said, "First going forth (enacting) his words, and then afterwards accompanying it [with speech]." 


子曰:「君子周而不比,小人比而不周。」

Zǐ yuē:`Jūnzǐ zhōu ér bùbǐ, xiǎo rén bǐ ér bù zhōu.'

The master said: The sage (Junzi) considers but does not compare. The small person compares but does not consider.


子曰:「學而不思則罔,思而不學則殆。」

Zǐ yuē:`Xué ér bù sī zé wǎng, sī ér bù xué zé dài.'

The master said: studying without reflection leads to (self) deception; thinking without studying leads to danger (perilous circumstances).


溫故而知新

This is a well-known phrase. However, the use of is interesting because it usually means "warm," or "to heat up." This may be an analogy, or it may indicate something about the feeling of recalling the past in a way that is pleasant. If this is the case, then it echoes 1.1, where learning and then applying knowledge is enjoyable. I think there is something to this, as we often delight in clearly recalling what we know and seeing how it can be applied to our present circumstances. However, this passage also suggests that recalling the past is important for understanding the new. This makes sense in light of a general concern in the Zhou dynasty with seeking to understand patterns of natural transformation and how those patterns help make the process of change intelligible and predictable. This is seen in Shang Dynasty scapulmancy, ancestor worship, early Yin-yang thought, the Book of Change (Yijing) and the Confucian interest in the Rites and Odes. There is a general sense in each of these that recalling the lessons of the past to understand the patterns of the present assists with successfully moving into the future.


This is often translated as vessel. It can also be translated as instrument. Both imply important concerns regarding the behavior of the sage.


先行其言,而後從之。

Legge gives, "He acts before he speaks, and afterwards speaks according to his actions." This requires reading 先行其言 in a before/after sense, which seems odd. The passage uses to create a temporal disjunction between going forth and coming from. In addition,  is often a pronoun.


These points suggest modifying the translation to something like, "First going forth (enacting) his words, and then afterwards accompanying it [with speech]." There is an interesting contrast between something moving forward and something following after. Also, the analects in general value trustworthiness or acting according to one's word, and also listening to others. Ames and Rosemont give, "They first accomplish what they are going to say, and only then say it." I think this is more correct.


Thursday, August 13, 2020

Translation - Analects 2.10 Watch their actions.

子曰:「視其所以,觀其所由,察其所安。人焉廋哉?人焉廋哉?」

子曰:视其所以,观其所由,察其所安。人焉廋哉?人焉廋哉? 

Shì qí suǒyǐ, guān qí suǒ yóu, chá qí suǒ ān. Rén yān sōu zāi? Rén yān sōu zāi?

"Watch their actions; observe their reasons; examine them at rest. People, how can they hide [their nature]? People, how can they hide [their nature]?"

Noteworthy elements:

The most interesting part of this translation for me was the following structure: [seeing verb] [person pronoun] [] [transitive verb].

This structure provides the basis for the passage.  and  can indicate simple sensory function, but they can also indicate a more evaluative manner of observation. can also be a kind of examination, but almost always involves an evaluative component. This may involve inquisitively examining the phonemena or considering consistency with prior phenomena.

results in turning the following transitive verb into a nominal phrase. For example, "take" or "use" becomes "that which is taken" or "that which is used." has a number of translations, but I tend to defer to "take" or "by means of."

This is an interesting case where and should be understood separately and not as 所以. The second and third phrases also use  but here it is clear is operating singularly.

*Side note, Chinese thought tends to regards sensory action in terms of complete/successful versus incomplete/unsuccessful; this is inherited  by modern linguistic conventions, e.g. 看到,看不到; the heart-mind is also regarded as a sense organ, and is responsible for evaluation.

Saturday, July 11, 2020

Translation - Analects 2.9 I spoke with Yan Hui all day.


子曰:「吾與回言終日,不違如愚。退而省其私,亦足以發。回也,不愚。」

Zǐ yuē:`Wú yǔ huí yán zhōng rì, bù wéi rú yú. Tuì ér shěng qí sī, yì zúyǐ fā. Huí yě, bù yú.'

The master said: "I with [Yan] Hui spoke [to] the whole day; not defying, as if foolish; withdrawing and then saving (observing) his person; also amply taking the [things] sent out. Hui certainly is not stupid.

The master said: I spoke with Yan Hui the whole day. He does not defy me, as if foolish. [When he] withdrew I watched his person. He amply took my teachings. Hui certainly is not stupid!

Key Terms:
zhōng = end; so the zhōng rì = to the end of the day = the whole day.
wéi = defy; be apart from
yú = stupid, doltish, foolish
sī = private, personal; secret

Notes:
The only real puzzle is 亦足以發. I'm not sure if should be an adverb ("He amply took the the things sent out.") or an adjective ("he [became] ample by means of [the things] sent out."). I'm actually inclined to the latter, but the former sounds more natural in English.

Friday, December 20, 2019

Translation - Analects 2.8 The Difficulty is Expression

子夏問孝。子曰:「色難。有事弟子服其勞,有酒食先生饌,曾是以為孝乎?」

Zǐ xià wèn xiào. Zǐ yuē: "Sè nán. Yǒu shì, dì zǐ fú qí láo; yǒu jiǔ shí, xiān shēng zhuàn; céng shì yǐ wéi xiào hū?"

Zixia asked about (being) filial. The Master said, "Countenance (is) difficult. (If) there are affairs, the young wear them (and) toil. (If) there is food and drink, (they) support the elders. Is this to be taken as filial piety?"

Again, this points to the problem of "color," or countenance. It might also be translated as "one's expression." The key to understanding the role of expression or countenance in the Confucian analects relies on playing the idea against the standard assumptions of filial piety. Zixia's question suggests this idea of filial piety is already part of the cultural discourse. Confucius acknowledges what might be part of this conventional view in his answer: taking on the labor of one's elders and ensuring one's elders are well-fed (and plied with appropriate drink).

However, Confucius suggests it would be a mistake to take these actions for filial piety. Being filial goes beyond mere support (2.7).

So what does Confucius take for filial piety? This passage provides one clue, which is the idea of one's countenance. This may appear superficial (pun intended?) but less so if think about emotional expression. Mencius eventually provides a clear psychological model of expression: we feel impulses in relation to our environment, and by acting on those impulses we bring about moral behavior. Despite the external nature of the expression, Mencius regards the moral impulse is internal to the person. The moral impulse may be internal, but those impulses occur within an environment and require proper expression.

So, what does this suggest about expression in the analects? The countenance, or one's expression, should be an expression of the relationship between parents and children. In Confucius' view, those who are treated with benevolence (kindness and charity) are unlikely to rebel (1.2). This holds for both parents and rulers, and suggests the parents and rulers have an obligation to care for their charges, whether children or subjects. Confucius explicitly states that filial piety can be recognized by the worry that parents feel for their children (2.6), and this presumably extends to rulers being concerned for their subjects. The reason one's expression is a difficult component of filial piety is that a genuine expression of appreciation results from a longstanding cultivation of a relationship. This idea surpasses the idea of filial piety as simply caring for one's elders, and suggests the reciprocal component of the relationship is a necessary precondition of the expression of filial piety.

Tuesday, December 10, 2019

Translation - Analects 2.7 Those who are filial today.

子游問孝。子曰:「今之孝者,是謂能養。至於犬馬,皆能有養;不敬,何以別乎?」

Zǐ Yóu wèn xiào. Zǐ yuē, "Jīn zhī xiào zhě, shì wèi néng yǎng. Zhì yú quǎn mǎ, jiē néng yǒu yǎng; bù jìng, hé yǐ bié hū?"

Zi You asked (about) being filial. The Master said, "Those who are filial today, are called so because (they) can nourish (the elderly). As for dogs and horses, anyone can be nourishing. (This is) not enough - what is the difference (between us and them)?

Zi You asked (about) being filial. The Master said, "Those who are filial today, they are called so because they can nourish the elderly. But if we extend this to dogs and horses, then anyone can be called nourishing. This is not enough! How can we distinguish ourselves?

至於 zhì yú = as far as (up to + in this location)
何以 hé yǐ = why/how (by what means)

The use of is interesting. In modern Chinese the term is usually reserved for raising children or animals; the idea is one of providing care to living beings who require care. I tend to connect to a sense of nourishing life. Confucius' answer cleverly does not actually answer what it means to be filial, but his answer implies that being filial both (1) involves caring for the vulnerable and weak; and (2) that those who are regarded as filial today simply provide food. But for Confucius, simply providing food is not enough. How do we distinguish caring for the elderly from caring for dogs and horses? The answer doesn't appear in this passage, but it does appear in the next passage (2.8): the issue is the countenance. This is previewed in 1.7, where the virtuous exert themselves for others (note: the commentaries appear to disagree on the meaning of 賢賢易色, but the putting forth of effort is clear).

We might discuss the relation of this to performance, but in English the term often performance implies a non-integral addition. For the Confucian project, however, one's emotional expression is an intimate component of moral behavior. This is particularly true for Mencius, who explicitly describes the relationship between internal feelings and external acdtions. For Mencius, the idea of expression is not simply a superficial external qualifier added to a fundamentally separate moral action. Rather, the mode of expression is viewed as the culmination of expressing the emotional impulse (or sprout) that occurs as a result of the filial relationship.

Tuesday, November 19, 2019

Translation - Analects 2.4 I set my heart on learning.


子曰:「吾十有五而志于學,三十而立,四十而不惑,五十而知天命,六十而耳順,七十而從心所欲,不踰矩。」

Zǐ yuē:`Wú shí yǒu wǔ ér zhì yú xué, sānshí érlì, sìshí ér bùhuò, wǔshí ér zhī tiānmìng, liùshí ér ěrshùn, qīshí ér cóngxīnsuǒyù, bù yú jǔ.'

The Master said: "At fifteen I determined (set my will) to study; at thirty I was upright (independent); at forty [I had] no doubts; at fifty I knew I knew heaven's commands; at sixty my ear was obedient; at seventy I could follow the desires of the heart-mind without exceeding the rules."

zhì purpose, will, determination
lì stand; erect, raise; establish, found; fix, set; determine, decide; become indepdent
huò confuse, mislead, baffle; doubt
mìng order, command; written command; will of heaven; fate; lifespan
shùn obey, submit, go along with
yù desire, want, long for; intend
yú exceed, transgress; cross over
jǔ carpenter's square, ruler; rule

Translation - Analects 2.6 Meng Wubo asked about being filial.


孟武伯問孝。子曰:「父母唯其疾之憂。」

Mèng Wǔbó wèn xiào.  Zǐ yuē: "Fù mǔ wéi qí jí zhī yōu."

Meng Wubo asked about being filial. The Master said: "Parents, because of the sickness of their children, grieve.

Meng Wubo asked about being filial. The Master said: "Parents grieve when their children are ill."

Where Meng Wubo is asking for proscriptive advice about how to be filial, or philosophical insight into the nature of being filial, Confucius' response provides neither. Confucius' answer (if it can be called that) appears oblique at first, a non-answer to a straightforward question. But Confucius' answer actually provides a great deal of information. We should remember that Confucius challenges his students to use one side of the square to find the other three. Given this approach, we can find at least two implied proscriptions for filial behavior.

The primary implication is that children should do their utmost to avoid causing their parents worry or concern. Children (according to the Confucian program) should study the rites, pursue learning, and generally practice the skills necessary to stand upright in adult society.

The second implication is less direct. Because parents worry when their children are ill, it implies parents should do their utmost to ensure their children well-raised and cared for. This worry in the parents is the reciprocal part of the filial relationship: because parents care for their children, the children desire to care for their parents. The duty is not externally imposed by society onto the child; rather, the duty is a manifestation of the emotional relationship between parent and child.

This reciprocal relationship between parent and child plays an important role in the first implication; when parents engage their children and assist their children in learning, then children experience learning as a process of successfully interacting in the world along with their parents - as opposed to an externally imposed system with little relation to their own happiness. When learning occurs as a part of interacting in the world, this develops a love of learning and the joy of putting things into practice (as suggested by Analects 1.1).

As an aside, the kind of learning suggested here can be seen clearly in Dewey's model of education: where play and learning are relevant because the knowledge and guidance provides a means to direct interest towards an environment.

See the below on challenging the assumptions inherent in modern education (assumptions Dewey argued against in 1916's Democracy and Education).

Tuesday, November 12, 2019

Translation - Analects 2.5 Meng Yizi asked about being filial.

孟懿子問孝。子曰:「無違」樊遲御,子告之曰:「孟孫問孝於我,我對曰『無違』。」樊遲曰:「何謂也?」子曰:「生事之以禮;死葬之以禮,祭之以禮。」

Mèng Yìzǐ wèn xiào.  Zǐ yuē: "Wú wéi." Fán Chí yù, Zǐ Gào zhī yuē: "Mèng sūn wèn xiào yú wǒ, wǒ duì yuē "wú wéi." Fán Chí yuē: "Hé wèi yě?" Zǐ yuē: "Shēng shì zhī yǐ lǐ; sǐ zàng zhī yǐ lǐ, jì zhī yǐ lǐ."

Minimalist Translation
Meng Yizi asked about filiality. The Master said: "Do not be disobey." Fan Chi was driving, [and] the Master told him: "Meng-sun asked me about filiality. I told him do not disobey." Fan Chi said: "What [is the] meaning?" The Master said: "[In] life, serve them according to ritual. In death, bury them according to ritual. Worship them according to ritual."

Refined Translation
Meng Yizi asked about being filial. The Master said, "do not be disobedient." When Fan Chi was driving, the Master remarked, "Meng-sun asked me about being filial. I told him do not be disobedient." Fan Chi asked, "What do you mean?" The Master said, "In life, serve your parents according to the rites. In death, bury your parents according to the rites. Worship and make sacrifices to your parents according tzo the rites."

無違
Wú wéi = without disobedience = do not be disobedient. This is not to be confused with the 無為 wú wéi of Laozi and Zhuangzi.

生事之以禮;死葬之以禮,祭之以禮。
There are two points of ambiguity here: (1) what is the pronoun antecedent for "之," and (2) how to interpret 事: as a noun (the affairs of life) or as a verb (to serve)? The second question can be answered by looking at the parallel structure in the passages: 葬 (bury) and 祭 (inter) are both more commonly used as verbs. This suggests 事 should be treated as a verb. Answering (2) provides a framework for answering (1): if we are serving, then who are we serving? The passage does not mention the parents explicitly, but serving, burying, and worshipping are all actions taken towards the parents. Therefore, serve the parents, bury the parents, make sacrifices to the parents. This framework provides a basis for treating 生 and 死 as instances of time (when the events take place). Therefore, "In life, serve the parents according to the rites; in death, bury the parents according to the rites; worship them according to the rites."

Philosophically, Confucius' insistence on ritual as the guiding criteria for filial piety is an important stance in the context of the Zhou dynasty. Rather than framing filial piety in terms of obeying the dictates of the parents, Confucius frames filial piety in terms of obedience to the rites. In this sense the rites open the possibility of maintaining standards separate from the dictates of the parents. Obedience is not blind obedience, but rather for the sake of upholding the rites, which in turn serve to nurture benevolence and harmony in human society. This again speaks to Confucius' depth of insight: the rites can be examined, altered, or critiqued, and are never followed merely for their own sake. The plasticity of the rites allows the rites to function as conceptual intermediaries for human behavior. This mediation functions as regulation, and this regulation serves to integrate human needs with the physical and social environment.

孟 mèng - first; great; founder
懿 yì - virtuous, admirable, esteemed
違 wéi - disobey, violate, defy
樊 fán - railing, fence; enclosed area
遲 chí - late, tardy, slow; delay
御 yù - drive, ride; chariot; manage
葬 zàng - bury, inter
祭 jì - sacrifice to, worship

Friday, November 8, 2019

Translation - Analects of Confucius 2.3 Those who are filial and fraternal.

2.3: 子曰:「其為人也孝弟,而好犯上者,鮮矣;不好犯上,而好作亂者,未之有也。君子務本,本立而道生。孝弟也者,其為仁之本與!」

2.3: Zǐ yuē: 'Qí wéi rén yě xiàodì, ér hǎo fànshàng zhě, xiān yǐ; bù hǎo fànshàng, ér hǎo zuòluàn zhě, wèi zhī yǒu yě. Jūnzǐ wù běn, běnlì ér dàoshēng. Xiàodì yě zhě, qí wèi rénzhī běn yǔ!'

2.3: The Master says: Those who are filial and fraternal to others but who relish crime, they are few; Those who abhor crime but who enjoy chaos/rebellion, [they] have yet to appear. The sage seeks the root, establishing the root the way is born. Those who are filial and fraternal, these (for the sake of) benevolence are the root!

本立而道生 I think this is pretty clearly "establishing the root (and then) the way is born." From a an English language/analytic point of view there appears to be a potential abiguity or contradiction: is 道 the great Way or simply one Way among many? This ambiguity focuses on the potentially different meanings of 道 and uses them to drive a wedge between possible translations.

However, from a more Confucian point of view, the point is not whether or not 道 means the Way or many individual ways. The point is that in establishing the root of something (and that root being filiality and fraternality), this gives rise to benevolent behavior. The method of achieving harmony is the same whether or not the way is conceived of as being a collection of natural processes or individual development. Individual development mirrors or reflects the greater natural process. Both require that events in their delicate primacy receive care, this care results in emotional relationships (filiality and fraternality), and these emotional relationships are then responsible for extending benevolent behavior to others.

Wednesday, August 14, 2019

Translation - Analects of Confucius 2.2 There are 300 Odes.

子曰:「詩三百,一言以蔽之,曰『思無邪』。」 Zǐ yuē: Shī sān bǎi, yī yǎn yǐ bì zhī, yuē "sī wú xié."

The master said: There are three hundred Odes, but one sentence may cover them all: "Think not (what is) wicked!"

Notes: this is another good example for the central role of moral psychology in classical Chinese thought, and a particularly good example on the relationship between self-cultivation and understanding in the analects. Confucius never intends the rituals to be performed for their own sake [1]; Confucius, in fact, explicitly criticizes those who merely memorize official documents [2] or practice from rote memory without understanding the circumstances or who practice ritual without an eye toward benevolence [3]. In fact, benevolence in general is the goal for Confucius: this requires both understanding the rituals and the circumstances, but surpasses merely correctly applying ritual to circumstances. The application of ritual may be beneficial, but is by itself insufficient. 

In this sense, the Odes may provide guidelines for action, but they also help the sage engage in the kinds of emotional imagination and activity necessary for beginning to understand emotional interactions with others.

Confucius' instruction here particularly points to the concern with habit, and how our habits (rituals) create habitual modes of thinking. Again, Confucius' concern here is with cultivating the heart-mind. 

[1] don't be a vessel
[2] don't be merely an officious scribe
[3] the goal of the sage is benevolence

Tuesday, August 26, 2014

Translation - Analects of Confucius 2.1

子曰:「為政以德,譬如北辰,居其所而眾星共之。」

Zǐ yuē: “Wéi zhèng yǐ dé, pì rú běi chèn, zhū qí suǒ ér zhòng xīng gǒng zhī.”

The Master Says: “Using virtue for governing (is) metaphorically like (being) (the) North Star, resting/stopping itself so (the) multitude (of) stars revolve around it.”

This is one of my favorite passages in the Analects: the image is captivating and inspiring while the conceptual content is complex and a bit paradoxical. Untangling the image leads to a very optimistic view of human nature and the capacity to inspire others with exemplary/virtuous behavior.

The key to this passage is remembering that virtue ( 德) is complex: it refers to the power/ability to direct or navigate circumstances, especially in conjunction with  daò 道. Remember that  daò 道 is not always perfectly clear, but the forces created by changing conditions do manifest in the environment and do create hazards to personal and social health.


In terms of the Confucian Sage 德 is the capacity to create harmony within society by creative or exemplary uses of knowledge, culture, or ritual.

The beauty of 德 is that exemplary practice can be truly inspirational, like a violin player or professional athlete inspiring awe and respect. We may not be able to directly emulate these exemplary individuals but they inspire us to excellence in our own pursuits. Exemplary practice of 德 actually raises the community standards for 德.

Thursday, July 24, 2014

Translation - Analects of Confucius 1.16

子曰:「不患人之不己知,患不知人也。」
Zǐ yuē: “Bù huàn rén zhī bù jǐ zhī, huàn bù zhī rén yě.”

Translation Process:
The Master said: "Do not worry (if) people do not know one's self; worry (about) not knowing people."

Polished Version:
The Master said: “I do not worry I do not worry that people do not know myself. I worry that I do not know the people."

Philosophical Notes:
This is a great example of the Confucian concern with fame versus respect. Confucius' point throughout the Analects is that effective governance is different from simply gaining fame or status. One's status as nobility is no guarantee of skillful governing. Confucius argues throughout that knowledge, study, and respect are foundations of successful social mediation. The reason these values are important are twofold: not only are knowledge and skill useful in running a government, but they also establish a positive reputation for the Sage. The Sage will ultimately be tested in his ability to uphold this reputation, and so the Sage must be ready.

Confucius recognizes the danger of seeking fame for its own sake, and warns against that here in this passage. The latter half is slightly more ambiguous - does he mean literally not knowing people? Does he mean lacking a knowledge of humanity or human nature in general? Or does he mean not recognizing people who have established themselves through merit? In all honesty it may be some combination of all three. A good Confucian sage functions by knowing the needs and desires of others so he can coordinate social structures to meet the needs of the many. In this manner the Sage works to avoid disrespecting or neglecting any member of the community. This kind of work requires attention to personal development and disposition, to the skills and personalities of the people under the Sage's care.

Translation Notes:
This is a fun passage because we can demonstrate several steps between the original Chinese and a finished translation. First I provide a pinyin Romanization. While not necessary I find it useful when dealing with unfamiliar characters. Making a pinyin translation from sight is also good practice for reviewing characters and tones. The next step is making a rough or blocked out translation. I do this so I can experiment with syntax and emphasis. Reading Confucius is like reading poetry, where the structure provides clues about how to understand the passage.

As we can see here, this entire passage is a great example of antimetabole (juxtaposing two phrases with similar wording but opposite meaning). In this case the literal shifting of the word order reflects the shifting perspective in moral order between the first passage and the second. We see antimetabole frequently in Chinese thought (ex: “He who speaks does not know, he who knows does not speak.” I suspect this happens because much of the cannon is concerned with drawing contrasts between different types of behavior. The compact nature of Classical Chinese also makes it easier to place words in close contrast.

I put a “polishd version” in here to demonstrate how much shifting around is actually possible in translation.


On a final note - this is the final passage from Chapter 1! I plan to keep working on this, but we may also do selections from the Dao De Jing along the way. The two are wonderful in juxtaposition to each other, and the contrast brings out some great similarities between the two works and systems of thought (if systems they ever were, yet systems we make them be).

Monday, July 21, 2014

Translation - Analects of Confucius 1.15

1.15  學而: 子貢曰:「貧而無諂,富而無驕,何如?」子曰:「可也。未若貧而樂,富而好禮者也。」子貢曰:「《詩》云:『如切如磋,如琢如磨。』其斯之謂與?」子曰:「賜也,始可與言詩已矣!告諸往而知來者。」

1.15: Zǐ Gòng yuē: ‘Pín ér wú chǎn, fù ér wú jiāo,’ hé rú?” Zǐ yuē: “Kě yě. Wèi ruò ‘Pín ér lè, fù ér hào lǐ zhě yě.’” Zǐ Gòng yuè: Shī yún: ‘Rú qiē rú cuō, rú zhuó rú mó.’ Qí sī zhī  wèi yú?” Zǐ yuē: Cì yě shǐ kě yǔ yán shī yǐ yǐ! Gào zhū wǎng ér, zhī lái zhě.”

1.15: Zi Gong said: “’Poor but not obsequious, wealthy but not arrogant.’ How is this?” The Master said: "Passable, but not the same as: 'Poor but enjoying Dao, wealthy but loving Propriety.'" Zi Gong said: “The Odes state: ‘Like a sharpened knife, like polished jade.’ Is this the meaning of that?” The Master said: “Like so! I can begin and then discuss the Odes! I tell what has passed and (you) know what comes next!”

Aphorism versus Example
The line between aphorism and example is blurry and we may see both in this passage. Aphorisms invoke an image as the proper moral stance in reponse to a situation. Examples may actual or hypothetical, and may serve the same purpose as invoking an aphorism – to provide an example of proper behavior. In this passage I like to imagine Confucius and Zi Gong discussing sayings regarding proper conduct. In this reading Zi Gong’s initial formulation is less effective than Confucius’ reply. Legge translates this passage as if Confucius and Zi Gong were discussiong groups of people. Ames and Rosemont translate this passage as if Confucius and Zi Gong are discussions aphorisms about proper conduct. I follow Ames and Rosemont in this issue. As an aspiring Shi (Scholar/Official), Zi Gong would be practicing the right way to formulate ritual sayings. He would also be practicing his ability to cite the Odes in support of his position. I follow LaFargue’s suggestion that much of the debate in early Chinese discourse was performed by formulating and contrasting aphorisms in an attempt to stake out the most defensible position in reference to common understanding and historic precedent.

如切如磋,如琢如磨 (Rú qiē rú cuō, rú zhuó rú mó)
This line is a direct reference to the Odes. The specific reference is to a passage spoken by Qi Yun in the Odes of Wei, which is itself a chapter in a section of the Odes known as the Lessons of the State. James Legge’s translation of this passage reads:
Look at those recesses in the banks of the Qi,
With their green bamboos, so fresh and luxuriant!
There is our elegant and accomplished prince, -
As from the knife and the file,
As from the chisel and the polisher!
How grave is he and dignified!
How commanding and distinguished!
Our elegant and accomplished prince, -
Never can he be forgotten!

This translation and the original passage can both be found at http://ctext.org/book-of-poetry/odes-of-wei#n14458. The passage referenced by Zi Gong is translated here as: “As from the knife and the file, as from the chisel and the polisher!” This itself is an approximation, as a more direct translation reads:

Like the knife like the polish,
Like the cut jade like the grindstone.

The Odes use the images of honing the knife and polishing the jade to represent the prince’s level of accomplishment and breeding. Confucius and Zi Gong consciously appropriate the ideas of cultivation and refinement, which previously were reserved for the nobility. Confucius and Zi Gong generalize the images of the knife and the jade so they can apply to anyone in any social standing. This strikes at the heart of Confucius’ cultural and historic significance, where he and his disciples appropriate concepts held by the nobility and successfully apply them to all members of society. Notice this passage includes virtuous stances for both the poor and the wealthy. So when Zi Gong is attempting to formulate a passage, it is more than simply trying to articulate a position, he is attempting to recast the concepts previously applied only to the nobility in such a way that are normative for any member of society.

The metaphors of the knife and the jade also reveal insights about Confucius' attitudes towards self-cultivation and education. Polishing the knife requires careful attention to detail and results in a fine finished product. Likewise, producing fine jade requires careful attention to cutting the jade and then time spent polishing the work. These tasks share important elements with education: self-motivation, respect for the task at hand, and a certain degree of skill. These requirements correspond to values prized by Confucius and serve as the basis for the Sage's moral cultivation. Education, filial respect, and rightness cultivate the Sage’s virtue or excellence, which in turn allows the sage cultivate harmony in society. Like a polished knife or polished piece of cut jade, the Sage must daily hone skills and knowledge for the sake of being a moral exemplar.

Confucius is ambiguous regarding the nature/nuture debate that we see between Xunzi and Mencius. Confucius says little about human nature except to comment that even he cannot teach someone who’s caracter is that of rotten wood – meaning prospective students must at least be capable of learning. As other writers have noticed the Analects contain metaphors for adornment/coloration as well as shaping, and both of these represent the Confucian project of cultivation and education.

Tuesday, July 15, 2014

Translation - Analects of Confucius 1.14 - Revision

1.14: 子曰:「君子食無求飽,居無求安,敏於事而慎於言,就有道而正焉,可謂好學也已。」

1.14: Zǐ yuē: Jūnzǐ shí wú qiú bǎo, jū wú qiú ān, mǐn yú shì ér shèn yú yán, jiú yǒu dào, ér zhèng yān, kě wèi hào xué yě yǐ.

1.14: The Master says: "The Sage meal(dining) does not seek full(ness)/fill, dwelling/still does not seek peace, clever in office/duty and/but cautious in speech, follow (those) with Dao and right/straighten yourself, can call good studying this!"

1.14: The Master says: "The Sage in dining does not seek fullness, in dwelling does not seek peace (complacency); is clever (skillful) in office but cautious in speech; follow (those) with Dao and right yourself, and you can call this good learning!"

Thanks to Doug Berger for helping correct my translation here! I tripped over 就 (jiú), which should be translated as a verb. That gives us "Follow (those who) have Dao, and (do) right things." We could smooth that over by saying: "Follow those with Dao and right yourself." Confucius emphasizes the importance of learning from others, and this is no exception. Following the example of those with Dao helps the Sage learn moderation and self-control in his own actions.

The passage is, as Doug explains, largely about seeking (求) the right things (正焉). When dining the sage does not seek fullness, and in resting at home does not seek complacency or laziness. In speech the Sage exercises caution but in serving his duties the sage is intelligent and dutiful. The sage follows those who provide good examples and rights himself.

I do think there is an element of self-control required in this process, which may provide a form of moral psychology. The Sage must be able to distinguish between desire and duty; the Sage must be able to withhold from excesses of desire and focus desire on valuing the correct measure of things. For Confucius the idea of Rightness is the performing one's duties expertly, so one leads others, provides guidance for others, and serves as inspiration for others.

Monday, July 14, 2014

Translation - Analects of Confucius 1.14

1.14: 子曰:「君子食無求飽,居無求安,敏於事而慎於言,就有道而正焉,可謂好學也已。」

1.14: Zǐ yuē: Jūnzǐ shí wú qiú bǎo, jū wú qiú ān, mǐn yú shì ér shèn yú yán, jiú yǒu dào, ér zhèng yān, kě wèi hào xué yě yǐ.

1.14: The Master says: "The Sage meal(dining) does not seek full(ness)/fill, dwelling/still does not seek peace, clever in office/duty and/but cautious in speech, in this manner possess/obtain Dao and right/straighten this/these, can call good studying this!"

1.14: The Master says: "The Sage in dining does not seek fullness, in dwelling does not seek peace (complacency); is clever (skillful) in office but cautious in speech; in this manner obtain Dao and straighten these (things), and you can call this good learning!"

居無求安 (jū wú qiú ān)
The phrase can be translated as “in dwelling does not seek peace,” which is something of a curious piece of advice: why wouldn’t the sage seek peace?  (ān) can mean "peace" or "tranquility," both seemingly desirable states of affairs. As a verb it can pacify, console, place, or arrange – again, it seems strange a sage might actively avoid these, especially given the emphasis on ritual in Confucian theory.

Let’s look for clues in the passage, beginning with the first phrase in the passage. 君子食無求飽 (Jūnzǐ shí wú qiú bǎo ) establishes a straightforward dichotomy between the action of the sage and the act of seeking something. This suggests we can apply the same dichotomy to居無求安: the Sage is not actively seeking peace or tranquility. This still leaves us with an unanswered question, however – why would a sage not actively seek this state of affairs?

One reading that resolves this tension actually views the problem not with the object, but with the action – in other words, the greater problem is not with peace and fullness per se, but with the problem of actively seeking these things. The concept of actively seeking something is highily problematic for Laozi and Zhuangzi, both of whom emphasize emptiness or effortless action (depending on your point of view). It may seem surprising to see it here in Confucius, but as we will see Confucius rejects forcefully implementing social change and will advocate for stillness as a kind of virtue. The use of   (emptiness/not) further suggests a strong contrast between the action of the sage and the action of actively seeking.

This reading is supported by a another segment of this passage, 就有道而正焉, which I turn to next.

就有道而正焉 (jiú yǒu dào ér zhèng yān)
This segment is a perfect example on why Classical Chinese is complicated: do you hold/possess the Dao? Do you exist in the Dao? Is there one Dao, many Dao, or just Dao? And once you have Dao (or possibly dwell in Dao), what do you govern? You govern well, but what is the object of ? All these questions are present in trying to translate this passage.

Let’s pass on philosophical speculation regarding Dao for the moment and simply accept that whatever is going on, Dao (or doing Dao) should be present.

Instead let's focus on the second half of the verb-clause, 而正焉 (ér zhèng yān). The presence of (ér) requires (zhèng) act as some kind of verb, either “striaghten out” or “govern.” (yān) can be an adverb (“here”), a demonstrative pronoun, or even a rhetorical pronoun (yes, these things exist). As an adverb we might get: “In this manner possess Dao and make upright here.” Not very satisfactory. As a rhetorical pronoun we get: “Just possess Dao and make upright.” Still not great. As a demonstrative pronoun we get: “Just possess Dao and make these upright.” This seems much better, but what do we make of "these?" Where are the pronoun antecedents?

One good option are the actions directed by (qiú), seeking. So the advice is to make ourselves upright or govern ourselves regarding  (qiú). This seems to make sense with the rest of the passage. We can “straighten out” or “govern” various habits, such as dining, dwelling, serving, and speaking. As for seeking peace, too much tranquility may interfere with fulfilling the duties of office. Or seeking peace may be unnecessary if we already possess Dao (and things occur naturally). If we can obtain Dao and straighten/govern our tendency to seek things beyond our need, then this may be called good learning!

If this reading is feasible then it helps build the case for a moral psychology in the text: curtailing the desire to seek unnecessary ends leads to better filial piety and ritual propriety. This fits well with the model of moral and psychological development Confucius presents in Analects 2.4. In this passage Confucius ultimately grows to the point where he can follow his desires without fear of transgressing rightness.

Saturday, July 5, 2014

Translation - Analects of Confucius 1.13

1.13: 有子曰:「信近於義,言可復也;恭近於禮,遠恥辱也;因不失其親,亦可宗也。」

1.13: Yǒu Zǐ yuē: Xìn jìn yú yì, yán kě fù yě; gōng jìn yú lǐ, yuǎn chǐ rǔ yě, yīn bù shī qí qīn, yì kě zōng yě.

1.13: You Zi says: Trust/trustworthiness (is) nearby in rightness, speech/doctrine capable (of) repetition/repeating (affirm!); respectful near/approach in ritual, distant shame (and) humiliation; because (of) not lose his family/intimate, also can (have) honor ancestors (affirm!)

1.13: Trust draws near in rightness (duty), so speech can pass back and forth; respect draws near in ritual, so shame remains far away. By not neglecting intimate (relations) one honors the ancestors!

義, 信, and 言 (yì, xìn, and yán)
One of the things I find most interesting in this passage is the relationship between 義 (righteousness/rightness), 信 (trust), and 言 (speech/doctrine). For most of the 20th century philosophy took for granted that propositional statements could clearly and accurately convey meaning without concern for time or distance. In direct contrast to this we see classical Chinese philosophy recognize the degradation of meaning that occurs over time and distance and the importance of maintaining clear and trustworthy speech. As we spend more time in ritual activities we build trust with a circle of relations - this sense of trust, gained from experience, allows for communication to be passed back and forth reliably (or at least more reliably than not). This is especially important when considered in the context of a pre-modern society where effectively governing large territories involves effectively communicating over long distances with little ability to confirm whether one's messages are being accurately conveyed.

義 ()
The etymology of 義 is particularly insightful (Ames and Rosemont Analects of Confucius 1998): the character is composed of 我 and 羊 and (in their interpretation) represents a person with axe in hand approaching the sacrificial sheep. Proper performance of ritual requires not shrinking from one's duty or responsibility. With Confucius duty and responsibility are not viewed as oppressive intrusions on individual freedom, but rather as the means by which we grow and participate in relationships. These relationships begin with the family and then grow outwards into society. In the context of the politics of the Zhou Dynasty, this kind of 義 involves the Sage dutifully serving a Ruler with skill, wisdom, and virtue. Such dependability both requires and generates trust, and allows language to pass back and forth faithfully and with a sense of reliability.

/于 ()
It may seem as if handles an uncomfortably large set of prepositional responsibilities: in, at, to, from, by, than, or out of – these are all possible translations. Despite this wide variety of terms the core concept is consistent: signifies something contained inside something else or something happening by virtue of being contained within something else. Given this, we could reword 1.13 to reflect a more active quality from the terms following :

1.13: “Trust emerges from rightness, so speech can pass back and forth; respect emerges from ritual, so shame remains far away. By not neglecting intimate relations there can be a true respect for the ancestors!”


宗 (zōng)
According to Fuller 宗 means “honor the ancestors.” According to Zhongwen 宗 means “ancestors” or “religion.” According to CTP 宗 means “lineage” or “ancestry.” The key between all these translations is honoring the ancestors at the ancestral shrines. Out of all the various choices “honoring ancestors” best captures the fusion of family relations with religious practices.

The political subtext here is interesting because honoring the ancestors involves making the proper forms of ritual respect at the shrines of the ancestors. This includes placing the ritual tablets in the correct order and paying homage to the ritual tablets of the Zhou dynasty. Thus we can interpret the passage in a “superficial” or general sense, where nurturing one’s close relations (family) is a form of behavior supported by the ancestors in general. Nurturing one’s immediate family helps the family survive, and by perpetuating the family line the family brings honor to the ancestors.

On another level – the subtext – we can see (again) how this translates into supporting the legitimacy of the Zhou dynasty specifically: “by not neglecting one’s intimate relations one can bring honor to the ancestors (of the proper rulers, the Zhou dynasty).” One possibility here is Confucius may be advocating the proper ritual education in ritual education as the ranks of the minor nobility prove insufficient to fill the growing demands of governance in the Spring and Autumn Period. This might, presumably, help ensure proper understanding of the ritual hierarchy of the nobility.