Translation - Analects 2.4 I set my heart on learning.

子曰：「吾十有五而志于學，三十而立，四十而不惑，五十而知天命，六十而耳順，七十而從心所欲，不踰矩。」

Zǐ yuē:`Wú shí yǒu wǔ ér zhì yú xué, sānshí érlì, sìshí ér bùhuò, wǔshí ér zhī tiānmìng, liùshí ér ěrshùn, qīshí ér cóngxīnsuǒyù, bù yú jǔ.'

The Master said: "At fifteen I determined (set my will) to study; at thirty I was upright (independent); at forty [I had] no doubts; at fifty I knew I knew heaven's commands; at sixty my ear was obedient; at seventy I could follow the desires of the heart-mind without exceeding the rules."

志 zhì purpose, will, determination

立 lì stand; erect, raise; establish, found; fix, set; determine, decide; become indepdent

惑 huò confuse, mislead, baffle; doubt

命 mìng order, command; written command; will of heaven; fate; lifespan

順 shùn obey, submit, go along with

欲 yù desire, want, long for; intend

踰 yú exceed, transgress; cross over

矩 jǔ carpenter's square, ruler; rule

Translation - Analects 2.6 Meng Wubo asked about being filial.

孟武伯問孝。子曰：「父母唯其疾之憂。」

Mèng Wǔbó wèn xiào.  Zǐ yuē: "Fù mǔ wéi qí jí zhī yōu."

Meng Wubo asked about being filial. The Master said: "Parents, because of the sickness of their children, grieve.

Meng Wubo asked about being filial. The Master said: "Parents grieve when their children are ill."

Where Meng Wubo is asking for proscriptive advice about how to be filial, or philosophical insight into the nature of being filial, Confucius' response provides neither. Confucius' answer (if it can be called that) appears oblique at first, a non-answer to a straightforward question. But Confucius' answer actually provides a great deal of information. We should remember that Confucius challenges his students to use one side of the square to find the other three. Given this approach, we can find at least two implied proscriptions for filial behavior.

The primary implication is that children should do their utmost to avoid causing their parents worry or concern. Children (according to the Confucian program) should study the rites, pursue learning, and generally practice the skills necessary to stand upright in adult society.

The second implication is less direct. Because parents worry when their children are ill, it implies parents should do their utmost to ensure their children well-raised and cared for. This worry in the parents is the reciprocal part of the filial relationship: because parents care for their children, the children desire to care for their parents. The duty is not externally imposed by society onto the child; rather, the duty is a manifestation of the emotional relationship between parent and child.

This reciprocal relationship between parent and child plays an important role in the first implication; when parents engage their children and assist their children in learning, then children experience learning as a process of successfully interacting in the world along with their parents - as opposed to an externally imposed system with little relation to their own happiness. When learning occurs as a part of interacting in the world, this develops a love of learning and the joy of putting things into practice (as suggested by Analects 1.1).

As an aside, the kind of learning suggested here can be seen clearly in Dewey's model of education: where play and learning are relevant because the knowledge and guidance provides a means to direct interest towards an environment.

See the below on challenging the assumptions inherent in modern education (assumptions Dewey argued against in 1916's Democracy and Education).

https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2018/05/11/603315432/the-best-mothers-day-gift-get-mom-out-of-the-box

Translation - Analects 2.5 Meng Yizi asked about being filial.

孟懿子問孝。子曰：「無違」樊遲御，子告之曰：「孟孫問孝於我，我對曰『無違』。」樊遲曰：「何謂也？」子曰：「生事之以禮；死葬之以禮，祭之以禮。」

Mèng Yìzǐ wèn xiào.  Zǐ yuē: "Wú wéi." Fán Chí yù, Zǐ Gào zhī yuē: "Mèng sūn wèn xiào yú wǒ, wǒ duì yuē "wú wéi." Fán Chí yuē: "Hé wèi yě?" Zǐ yuē: "Shēng shì zhī yǐ lǐ; sǐ zàng zhī yǐ lǐ, jì zhī yǐ lǐ."

Minimalist Translation
Meng Yizi asked about filiality. The Master said: "Do not be disobey." Fan Chi was driving, [and] the Master told him: "Meng-sun asked me about filiality. I told him do not disobey." Fan Chi said: "What [is the] meaning?" The Master said: "[In] life, serve them according to ritual. In death, bury them according to ritual. Worship them according to ritual."

Refined Translation
Meng Yizi asked about being filial. The Master said, "do not be disobedient." When Fan Chi was driving, the Master remarked, "Meng-sun asked me about being filial. I told him do not be disobedient." Fan Chi asked, "What do you mean?" The Master said, "In life, serve your parents according to the rites. In death, bury your parents according to the rites. Worship and make sacrifices to your parents according tzo the rites."

無違
Wú wéi = without disobedience = do not be disobedient. This is not to be confused with the 無為 wú wéi of Laozi and Zhuangzi.

生事之以禮；死葬之以禮，祭之以禮。
There are two points of ambiguity here: (1) what is the pronoun antecedent for "之," and (2) how to interpret 事: as a noun (the affairs of life) or as a verb (to serve)? The second question can be answered by looking at the parallel structure in the passages: 葬 (bury) and 祭 (inter) are both more commonly used as verbs. This suggests 事 should be treated as a verb. Answering (2) provides a framework for answering (1): if we are serving, then who are we serving? The passage does not mention the parents explicitly, but serving, burying, and worshipping are all actions taken towards the parents. Therefore, serve the parents, bury the parents, make sacrifices to the parents. This framework provides a basis for treating 生 and 死 as instances of time (when the events take place). Therefore, "In life, serve the parents according to the rites; in death, bury the parents according to the rites; worship them according to the rites."

Philosophically, Confucius' insistence on ritual as the guiding criteria for filial piety is an important stance in the context of the Zhou dynasty. Rather than framing filial piety in terms of obeying the dictates of the parents, Confucius frames filial piety in terms of obedience to the rites. In this sense the rites open the possibility of maintaining standards separate from the dictates of the parents. Obedience is not blind obedience, but rather for the sake of upholding the rites, which in turn serve to nurture benevolence and harmony in human society. This again speaks to Confucius' depth of insight: the rites can be examined, altered, or critiqued, and are never followed merely for their own sake. The plasticity of the rites allows the rites to function as conceptual intermediaries for human behavior. This mediation functions as regulation, and this regulation serves to integrate human needs with the physical and social environment.

孟 mèng - first; great; founder
懿 yì - virtuous, admirable, esteemed
違 wéi - disobey, violate, defy
樊 fán - railing, fence; enclosed area
遲 chí - late, tardy, slow; delay
御 yù - drive, ride; chariot; manage
葬 zàng - bury, inter
祭 jì - sacrifice to, worship

Translation - Analects of Confucius 2.3 Those who are filial and fraternal.

2.3: 子曰：「其為人也孝弟，而好犯上者，鮮矣；不好犯上，而好作亂者，未之有也。君子務本，本立而道生。孝弟也者，其為仁之本與！」

2.3: Zǐ yuē: 'Qí wéi rén yě xiàodì, ér hǎo fànshàng zhě, xiān yǐ; bù hǎo fànshàng, ér hǎo zuòluàn zhě, wèi zhī yǒu yě. Jūnzǐ wù běn, běnlì ér dàoshēng. Xiàodì yě zhě, qí wèi rénzhī běn yǔ!'

2.3: The Master says: Those who are filial and fraternal to others but who relish crime, they are few; Those who abhor crime but who enjoy chaos/rebellion, [they] have yet to appear. The sage seeks the root, establishing the root the way is born. Those who are filial and fraternal, these (for the sake of) benevolence are the root!

本立而道生 I think this is pretty clearly "establishing the root (and then) the way is born." From a an English language/analytic point of view there appears to be a potential abiguity or contradiction: is 道 the great Way or simply one Way among many? This ambiguity focuses on the potentially different meanings of 道 and uses them to drive a wedge between possible translations.

However, from a more Confucian point of view, the point is not whether or not 道 means the Way or many individual ways. The point is that in establishing the root of something (and that root being filiality and fraternality), this gives rise to benevolent behavior. The method of achieving harmony is the same whether or not the way is conceived of as being a collection of natural processes or individual development. Individual development mirrors or reflects the greater natural process. Both require that events in their delicate primacy receive care, this care results in emotional relationships (filiality and fraternality), and these emotional relationships are then responsible for extending benevolent behavior to others.